Knowledge Base

Everything you need to understand plasma technology all in one place.

Knowledge Articles

Enhancing Durability and Impact Resistance of UHMWPE/STF Composites through Plasma Treatment

In this recent publication in the Journal of Engineered Fibres and Fabrics, researchers from the Hebei Technology Innovation Centre of Textiles use the Henniker HPT-300 plasma system to enhance the interfacial adhesion of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and prepare flexible protective composites. UHMWPE has excellent mechanical properties, making it an ideal reinforcing component for impact-resistant (e.g. bullet-proof) composite materials.
 
Enhancing Surface Adhesion and Catalytic Activity

In the work, the authors found that hydrogen and argon plasma treatments increased the surface energy and roughness of textile samples, improving their surface adhesion and catalytic activity. They discovered that argon and oxygen plasma were the best choices for surface activation when the primary objective is to increase the wettability of polyethylene.

Materials Methods and Further Treatments
 
The high-performance fibre reinforcements underwent a thorough surface treatment process to eliminate impurities and oil. Following the preparation of a PEG and SiO2 mixture, the samples were treated with the resultant Shear Thickening Fluid (STF) using an ultrasonic cleaning machine for a duration of one hour to ensure the uniform distribution of the STF on the samples. The samples were subsequently subjected to vacuum oven treatment to obtain the final UHMWPE/STF inter-ply hybrid composite. Figure 1 displays the step-by-step preparation process of the UHMWPE/STF inter-ply hybrid composites.

 

images large 10.1177 15589250211043832 fig1

Figure 1. Preparation process of UHMWPE/STF inter-ply hybrid composites. 
Courtesy of
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15589250211043832

  Results

The use of plasma treatment was shown to enhance surface roughness and adhesion of samples, resulting in improved interfacial properties. This was evidenced by the significant increase in SiO2 adhesion amount in UHMWPE after argon plasma treatment, as demonstrated through SEM photographs. Figure 2 depicts the SEM images of UHMWPE reinforcement and composites, highlighting the impact of plasma treatment on surface morphology. As seen in Figure 2(a), the untreated fabric surface was observed to be smooth, while the UHMWPE reinforcement sample treated with 150W-60s-4sccm plasma (Figure 2(b)) exhibited a notably rougher surface compared to the untreated sample.
 

images large 10.1177 15589250211043832 fig4

Figure 2. SEM photographs of samples: (a) UHMWPE reinforcement without plasma treatment and (b) with 150 W–60 s–4 sccm plasma treatment; (c) the composites without plasma treatment and (d) with 150 W–60 s–4 sccm plasma treatment.
Courtesy of  journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15589250211043832

Effect of Ar plasma treatment on the water contact angle 

The authors found that by varying the treatment parameters, they could achieve the optimal water contact angle. The study revealed that the treating power, time, and gas flow rate had a significant impact on the plasma treatment and interfacial performance, as shown in Figure 3. Increasing the treating power gradually decreased the water contact angle, with the most significant change occurring between 50 W and 125 W. Moreover, a higher gas flow rate and treating time led to a significant decrease in the water contact angle. The treating power was found to be the most influential factor, followed by treating time and gas flow rate. The study's findings provide valuable insights into the optimal parameters for argon plasma treatment to achieve the desired water repellency in STF inter-ply hybrid composites.

images large 10.1177 15589250211043832 fig5

Figure 3. Water contact angle of STF inter-ply hybrid composites with various (a) power, (b) treating time, and (c) gas flow rate.
Courtesy of journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15589250211043832

 Effect of Ar plasma treatment on resistance impact 

In the case of composites, resistance impact testing is used to assess the strength and durability of the material when subjected to impact or shock loads, which can help determine its suitability for various applications.

The study identified the most important influencing factors and their impact on the strength of composite materials, as shown in Figure 4, and were able to demonstrate that higher gas flow rates, longer treatment times, and increased power levels all contribute to greater impact resistance in UHMWPE reinforcement. Specifically, the black curve at the top followed by the red curve indicate that higher gas flow rates lead to higher impact resistance, while longer treatment times lead to improved impact resistance as well. The impact force of the UHMWPE reinforcement increased rapidly with an increase in gas flow rate and treating time.

Similarly, Figure 4(b) and (c) illustrate that higher power levels and longer treatment times also result in improved impact resistance in composite materials. The results of the study showed that power had the greatest impact on the composites compared to treating time and gas flow rate. These findings suggest that plasma treatment can be an effective method for enhancing the impact resistance of composite materials and can also be optimised by adjusting specific process parameters.

images large 10.1177 15589250211043832 fig7

Figure 4. (a) Load-displacement curve of the same power, (b) load-displacement curve of the same treating time, and (c) load-displacement curve of the same flow.
Courtesy of journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15589250211043832

 Conclusions 

This study investigated the impact of Ar plasma treatment on UHMWPE reinforcement and its application in flexible composites with shear thickening liquid. The results showed that the surface of UHMWPE was mildly damaged, leading to improved surface roughness. The study also found that the impact force of UHMWPE/STF composites was influenced by treating time, power, and gas flow rate. The optimal parameters were determined to be a treating time of 150 s, treating power of 100 W, and a gas flow rate of 4 sccm, resulting in the maximum impact resistance of the UHMWPE reinforcement.

For more information please contact us today or read the paper in full

See what our customers have to say

  • "The technical team at Henniker are very knowledgeable and supportive and always approachable. I have found it a pleasure to work with them."

    Simon Baxter - BAE Systems, MAI

    BAE
  • "Henniker guided us to choose the most suitable plasma unit for our application, ensured an accelerated delivery time & guided us through the very easy setup. We obtained quality results with their unit within minutes of setup & consistent results thereafter. The support they have provided has been rapid and helpful."

    Dr Ravi Desai - Making Lab, Francis Crick Institute

    Francis Crick Institute
  • "Henniker provided our team with excellent service during the course of our work together, the plasma cleaner arrived quickly and was installed with ease, giving us visible results from the outset and confirming that we made the right decision in choosing a local UK manufacturer."

    Dr Panagiotis Manesiotis BSc MRSC - Queen’s University Belfast

    Queens Uni Belfast
  • "Our customers and operations demand reliability at every level and were a key factor in our decision to choose a UK based manufacturer of plasma treatment equipment."

    Tom Doak - Trak Microwave

    Queens Uni Belfast
  • "Henniker’s after sales support is first class. They have always been extremely responsive if we have ever had need to call on them."

    Steve Rackham - Teledyne

    Teledyne
  • "Henniker’s plasma systems have delivered tangible benefits to us right from day one. The team there are very easy to work with."

    Ian Bruce - Coopervision

    Coopervision
  • "Henniker really stood out, both in their product range and technical knowledge. They are a great company to work with."

    Karthik Nair - University of Bradford

    University of Bradford
  • "We are very impressed with the ease of use and reliability of our plasma unit and were producing results within minutes of setting it up."

    Dr Neil Wilson - Warwick University

    Warwick University
  • "Our collaborative work with the team at Henniker was a very positive experience and one that we look forward to developing further."

    Ewen Kellar - TWI

    TWI
  • "Henniker provided a tailored product to match our exact requirements. They are a pleasure to work with."

    Dr Will Shu - Heriot Watt University

    Heriot Watt University

  • Huf
  • Kingspan
  • BOC
  • Maclaren
  • Cambridge Uni
  • Warwick Uni
  • Morgan Ceramics
  • QMUL
  • University Bradford
  • BAE
  • Imperial College London
  • Heriot Watt Uni
Henniker Plasma Logo

ISO logo

 

 

Connect with us

Henniker 3 Berkeley Court, Manor Park, Runcorn, WA7 1TQ, UK

+44 (0)1925 830 771   +44 (0)1925 800 035     info@plasmatreatment.co.uk